{"id":6055,"date":"2020-10-20T08:36:55","date_gmt":"2020-10-19T19:36:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abstractedreality.com\/?p=6055"},"modified":"2023-01-19T15:37:17","modified_gmt":"2023-01-19T02:37:17","slug":"mind-triptych-judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abstractedreality.com\/mind-triptych-judge\/","title":{"rendered":"In the Mind of a Triptych Judge"},"content":{"rendered":"
I recently had the privilege of being one of three judges in the 2020 Nelson National Triptych Salon, hosted by the Nelson Camera Club of New Zealand. I thoroughly enjoyed looking at the 466 entries and am heartened that the art of creating a triptych is alive and well in this country.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s often the nature of a big, national competition like this, that feedback to individual photographers can be limited to an \u2018Accepted\u2019 or \u2018Not Accepted\u2019 result. So, in an effort to provide some general feedback to participants and prospective entrants in the future, I thought I\u2019d offer some observations and tips to help improve your triptych making.<\/p>\n
At the end of this blog post, I\u2019ll also be showing you the top four triptychs in the Salon with accompanying commentary on the winning images. The authors of these images have very kindly allowed me to share their wonderful creations with you in this article.<\/p>\n
As with any single photograph, a triptych must communicate something to the viewer, and the way in which the three panels combine to achieve this is the key.<\/p>\n
Is an emotion, message, theme or story enhanced or developed by conveying it within three different panels?<\/p>\n
How successfully can the triptych be understood and processed as a cohesive and unified visual experience?<\/p>\n
Do the three panels have more meaning and context when viewed together rather than apart?<\/p>\n
Are the three panels balanced in terms of subject matter and visual continuity?<\/p>\n
Are shapes and patterns expanded upon across the three panels?<\/p>\n
With a bit of luck, these fundamental questions will encourage you to think about your choice of subject and how you can approach, present and craft your material (whatever it may be) into a compelling and creative triptych.<\/p>\n
Alright, time for some observations and \u2018dos and don\u2019ts\u2019 from the Salon. I want to stress these are just my own personal perspectives, ideas and criteria, but I hope they\u2019re helpful and will give you an insight into my judging process!<\/p>\n
Please, please, please, make sure you read the competition guidelines and follow the instructions! This may seem pretty basic advice, but there were triptychs which I really enjoyed and would have accepted were it not for the fact that they didn\u2019t comply with the rules. The two biggest offending areas:<\/p>\n
Be very careful with your choice of background colour \u2013 something neutral is best for most triptychs and even black can be very effective. Unfortunately, some backgrounds were too intrusive. Essentially, you don\u2019t want the background colour to draw attention away from the panels, or clash with the colour palette of the triptych. Keep it simple.<\/p>\n
There were many beautiful images which worked extremely well as a single image, but which didn\u2019t work as successfully in the triptych format \u2013 the splitting into panels did nothing to \u2018add value\u2019 or enhance the original image. In some instances, the cuts were distracting.<\/p>\n
If you’re not totally convinced that by cutting your image into three parts, you can convey your story better, or communicate your vision with greater clarity, don’t do it.<\/p>\n
Well, yes \u2013 mathematically, but it doesn\u2019t always work for a triptych. What do I mean? You may have taken three shots in a particular location or area, so thematically or geographically, all three images have a connection in that regard.<\/p>\n
However, I don\u2019t believe you can put three images together of a location and call it a triptych without there being some additional compositional or structural connection between the panels. The images still need to \u2018flow\u2019 and have something to visually link them together for the viewer to comprehend and process what they see as an actual \u2018triptych\u2019. On several occasions, it felt like three separate and distinct images were being placed next to each other and unfortunately, these didn\u2019t function well as a whole.<\/p>\n
The Salon included many triptychs of various birds, animals and portraits of people. With this type of subject matter, to really make your triptych stand out:<\/p>\n
For me, three very similar \u2018portraits\u2019 of the same subject which don\u2019t have these extra \u2018creative\u2019 factors aren\u2019t enough, neither is the subject doing essentially the same thing in each image with minimal variation going to be strong enough to gain an \u2018Acceptance\u2019.<\/p>\n
An extra word of caution \u2013 try not to have the background in each image too busy and\/or different; it will distract from the subject.<\/p>\n
While depicting a flower (or even insect) in its growth cycle lends itself well to the triptych format \u2013 it has been done a lot! My feeling is that in a competition setting, it will need to be exceptionally<\/em> well done, both technically and creatively, to achieve success. Something with a slight twist on this theme, and a different viewpoint added into the mix will help to elevate the triptych and set it apart from the other entries.<\/p>\n If you are creating a triptych of a sporting or civic event, the usual rules apply. Try to avoid just putting three images of the same event next to each other which have no linear or sequential connecting factor. Aim to show a developing story with your panels where all three of the images are required to explain or depict the whole proceeding. While each image of the triptych, in isolation, may convey the \u2018flavour\u2019 of the event, the three images, in combination, ideally should provide greater overall context, clarity and understanding of what has taken place.<\/p>\n Technical competency is not the highest priority for me; I rate creative vision and communication far higher. However, the images do need to be of a high standard. Any glaring deficiencies will lesson your chance of making a good first impression and hinder your chances of success.<\/p>\n I was really pleased to see some experimentation and a wide variety of different triptych layouts used by the Salon entrants. There was a good mix of vertical, horizontal and T-junction placements as well as some images being cut on a diagonal. Some triptychs contained panels of different sizes and some panels were also placed in a staggered, step-like design. There were even circular and oval panels.<\/p>\n When I assess a triptych\u2019s composition, I look for how the panels are used to enhance the subject matter or story, and how successfully their arrangement provides a unified and coherent visual experience:<\/p>\n Humour goes a long way. I\u2019m certainly not averse to authors injecting a bit of humour and light relief into their triptychs. Several of the entries in the Salon put a big smile on my face, either with their ingenious interpretation of a subject, depiction of an entertaining and amusing story, or presentation of a person or animal in a rare and comical situation.<\/p>\n A creative or playful title can also be a big plus.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s now take a look at the winning triptychs from the Salon. Once again, I\u2019d like to thank the authors for their willingness to make these images available for this blog post.<\/p>\n These four triptychs really hit the mark and embody the elements which myself and the other judges were looking for:<\/p>\n My accompanying commentary for each triptych will hopefully shed a little more insight into why we selected these images for the top awards.<\/p>\nPhoto Journalism Style Triptychs<\/h4>\n
Technical Competency<\/h4>\n
Different Triptych Layouts<\/h4>\n
\n
Good for a Laugh!<\/h4>\n
The Winning Triptychs<\/h3>\n
\n